Miners' Welfare Fund

Also known asMiners' Welfare Commission, Mining Industry Act 1920 welfare levy, Coal Industry Social Welfare Organisation, CISWO
CategoryLaw & Custom

A national fund for the welfare of coal miners and their families, created by section 20 of the Mining Industry Act 1920 and paid for by a levy of a penny on every ton of coal raised in the country. It built the welfare halls, institutes, recreation grounds and pithead baths that stand in mining villages all over Britain.

A stone-fronted institute building with a war memorial in front of it at Coaltown of Wemyss in Fife
Miners' Welfare Institute, Coaltown of Wemyss Euan Nelson, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Geograph

Historical usage

The fund came out of the Sankey Commission, and the levy ran from July 1920. It was administered not by the government but by a statutory committee with, in its chairman's words, absolute discretion; the Board of Trade could veto the purposes but not the decisions. At a penny a ton on around 240 million tons a year the fund took in roughly a million pounds annually, and between 1920 and 1951 more than thirty million pounds was spent. In 1934, after an inquiry under Lord Chelmsford, the levy was halved to a halfpenny and the fund's life extended to 1951. The Miners' Welfare Act 1952 finally discontinued the levy and wound the fund up, and its successor body survives today as the Coal Industry Social Welfare Organisation, a charity since 1995 and still the only national charity working solely for former coal miners, their families and their communities.

How it worked

Money was raised by the levy and divided between district committees, which brought forward schemes for their own coalfields. What the committee would fund was set out in section 20 as purposes connected with the social well-being, recreation and conditions of living of workers in or about the coal mines, and elaborated in a memorandum of October 1921. In practice that meant welfare institutes and halls, recreation grounds and playing fields, convalescent homes, scholarships, and from 1926 the national pithead baths programme that built more than eight hundred baths.

Why it was used

Housing had been deliberately excluded from the fund's purposes, and wages were nobody's business but the industry's, so what was left was everything around the work: somewhere to meet, somewhere for the children to play, somewhere to wash. Viscount Chelmsford, who chaired the committee, put its object to the House of Lords in 1922 as being to bring sweetness and light into the mining districts and to brighten the individual and social life of those districts.

Risks & limitations

The money was a levy on coal, so four fifths of it came out of the men's own wages under the wage agreements of the day, and in bad years that was resented. In June 1922 the Lancashire and Cheshire district, where colliers were working three shifts a week for 25s 9d, asked for their share of the fund to be paid out in aid of wages. The Law Officers said it would be legal. The committee refused: Parliament had not intended it, the money would be gone in weeks, and nothing lasting would remain. Lord Strachie told the House that the men would rather have help with the rent than musical entertainments. The committee's answer was that it would fund any scheme within the Act that happened to create work.

Related terminology

Miners' Row, National Coal Board, Pithead Baths

Mines associated with this term

Included only where MineArchive's own research gives a reasonable evidential basis — not every mine where this might plausibly apply.

Sources

  1. (primary) Miners' Welfare Fund, House of Lords, 21 June 1922 — Hansard, UK Parliament
  2. (secondary) About us — Coal Industry Social Welfare Organisation

Record created: 11 September 2026 · Last researched: 11 September 2026

Accessibility options

Saved in this browser and applied on every page. Colour is never the only cue on MineArchive; if links are hard to pick out, underline them or raise the contrast. For larger text, use your browser's zoom.

Contrast
Link visibility
Motion
Reading width